tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5334016854115185623.post819128093206262939..comments2024-02-27T00:27:26.770-08:00Comments on "Michael Jackson Conspiracy" by Aphrodite Jones: Acknowledgement for a new integrity in journalismAphrodite Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07662863943649023122noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5334016854115185623.post-67282239955826477622013-01-18T18:17:59.628-08:002013-01-18T18:17:59.628-08:00top [url=http://www.001casino.com/]online casino[/...top [url=http://www.001casino.com/]online casino[/url] brake the latest [url=http://www.casinolasvegass.com/]casino games[/url] free no deposit bonus at the chief [url=http://www.baywatchcasino.com/]www.baywatchcasino.com <br />[/url].Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5334016854115185623.post-28596410003036886062012-06-07T08:00:54.430-07:002012-06-07T08:00:54.430-07:00is true is absolutely right, as always there are p...is true is absolutely right, as always there are people who are professional and says they do is take advantage of the situationsports handicapping serviceshttp://www.priceperheadcostarica.com/betting-software-services/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5334016854115185623.post-36776010190565296972009-03-14T09:19:00.000-07:002009-03-14T09:19:00.000-07:00I followed this case from the UK, and the wider Ja...I followed this case from the UK, and the wider Jackson ordeal for the last 20 years. I must say that I'm very conscious of the Mockingbird style court of public opinion we have on both sides of the water. Over here, we've just had Ms Peaches Geldof making very suggestive innuendo about Jackson. No-one seems to care anymore that comments like this lead to more than lawful investigation - they lead to the public assassination of a person's character, morals, profession etc. I can't help thinking that these latest claims are VERY redolent of the Kill a Mockingbird storyline of the indictment of a black man due to the hearsay of a white woman. And of course the tabloids love it here: the Sun newspaper reported the story with all their characteristic emotive flatulence. I do hope that Mr Jackson spends some time in the next few years planning to defend himself publicly - I think he owes himself that at the very least. I suspect though that he will eventually be pushed to sue a few people for liable before then. Good luck to him - I think the world owes him a public apology.Clarissahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06368093571011247421noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5334016854115185623.post-58612510883636258942007-08-10T15:08:00.000-07:002007-08-10T15:08:00.000-07:00i'm just flabberghasted by the response to your bo...i'm just flabberghasted by the response to your book...in our country, we have freedom of speech and liberty for all. i just can't believe all of this hate directed at michael jackson. but with so many personalities like nancy grace who were almost all former prosecutors, the bigger the lie the more people will believe it. and you're right, they kept feeding these lemons to the american public.brnthsdiscouthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13747176956034242055noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5334016854115185623.post-84597608978689821602007-07-26T17:32:00.000-07:002007-07-26T17:32:00.000-07:00I think this is something really important that mo...I think this is something really important that most people just don't understand. On TV, anyone can come on and say pretty much anything without any regard to the truth, without any requirement as to the veracity of the information being presented. I think people forget that television, magazines, etc. all exist to MAKE A PROFIT. They're top priority is not delivering the truth and facts, but delivering a story that is entertaining enough to get people to tune in and make them a profit. It's a business, not a public service. <BR/><BR/>In a courtroom though, the object is not to make a profit, but to find the truth. Therefore there are rules and procedures to facilitate the process of sifting out the truth from the rest. That is why not everything that gets on TV is not necessarily admissible in a courtroom.gilesmichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12286850393315060867noreply@blogger.com